Google: more is less

Google’s homepage has gone all pictorial this morning, with a full-bleed image cluttering up their normally pristine page. You can change the picture, choosing from a range of pre-selected shots (including shots of work by Dale Chihuly, Jeff Koons, Tom Otterness, Polly Apfelbaum, Kengo Kuma (隈研吾), Kwon, Ki-soo (권기수) and Tord Boontje, as well as shots from Yann Arthus-Bertrand and National Geographic.

You can stick in your own images too (that’s one of ours above), choose one from a public gallery, or set it to a single colour (as below), or even back to white (which is actually quite elegant, leaving a shadowed logo, rather than the usual mulitcoloured one).

Except if you’re using Safari, which isn’t playing along at all, just showing the classic Google homepage. Wonder if that’s a tech issue or just a low-level skirmish in the browser wars…

And frankly, as Safari users, we’re happy with the standard page: we don’t want our search window to be anything other than a search window. Less, as ever, is more.

13 Responses to “Google: more is less”

  1. Dennis says:

    Awful idea from Google….

  2. Hugh McNally says:

    Safari 5, for me, is rendering Google’s UI disaster just fine (as in, the way they intend it).

  3. bzlyons@gmail.com says:

    A stupid stupid move…less is better than more. It’s distracting, annoying and not in keeping with google’s image. I may change my search engine if they do not give one an option of no background

  4. wemadethis says:

    Hugh – hmm, maybe it’s a .co.uk (or more likely, any of the non .com URLs) thing then… it’s still not showing for us in Safari.

  5. Jerry says:

    Agreed!

  6. Ian Devlin says:

    Doesn’t work on Safari 5.0 for me either, whether I go to .co.uk or .com or am logged in or not.
    I don’t like it anyway.

  7. Aaron S. says:

    time to go back to the old fashion search window or at least and option to opt out

  8. sarah says:

    safari users are lucky. i want my normal google homepage back. if i wanted to use bing, i would use bing.

  9. pyko says:

    I liked it better when it was just nice, simple and white. Don’t want to be forced to load an image – there is nothing wrong with white background! Google needs to make it optional!

  10. Simon E says:

    With the AdBlock Plus add-on you can stop Firefox loading the background images but you get white-one-white.
    I can’t comprehend why Google think this is such a great idea, particularly as there is no easy opt-out. I have now switched to using the toolbar search box and have changed my homepage from google.co.uk to something else.

  11. LawrenceGS says:

    Its only featured for 24 hours as a showcase guys. I like the background, and I’m sure there are people like me who like the idea but never know until today. Tomorrow your good old google will be back….
    http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/art-of-homepage.html

  12. I think it shows a lot of freshness from google that they dare to change what we are sp used to use that we freak out if a pixel or 2 is not on the same spot when googling :) Hey man instead of change pics please make some more games same the doodle, that was especially good for working people so they could be a little less productive, hey bring some more games man :)

  13. Hugh McNally says:

    Thankfully, Google reverted to the “you decide” model of bkg imagery, but I think you’re right: the non-.com Google entities did not exhibit this problem today. This was actually widely reported as a way to avoid the forced bkgs, as was using the SSL “https” beta version.

YOUR COMMENT